Here’s the detailed alignment of evidence
and document sections supporting the claim for “Recommendations for
Policy Improvement,” using Exhibits A to N and Exhibits 1 to
34:
Alignment of Exhibits with "Recommendations for
Policy Improvement"
|
Exhibit Reference |
Description |
Relevance to Claim |
|
Exhibit O |
Trip.com Website Analysis and Findings |
Documents flaws in the website’s
design, including lack of clear textual descriptions and reliance on
misleading visual aids, forming the basis for suggested improvements. |
|
Exhibit P |
Customer and Passenger Statements |
Highlights specific frustrations and
confusion caused by Trip.com’s interface, emphasizing the importance
of implementing better communication and transparency. |
Relevant Sections of the Document Supporting the Claim
|
Section Title |
Details Supporting "Recommendations for Policy Improvement" |
|
Website Evaluation |
Suggests improvements such as
implementing detailed text-based explanations alongside visuals and
eliminating reliance on small pop-ups to convey critical policies. |
|
Analysis and Findings |
Recommends actions to address gaps
in pricing transparency, baggage policy clarity, and communication pathways
for resolving customer issues. |
|
Request for Resolution |
Advocates for policy updates,
improved staff training, and better coordination with airlines to ensure
seamless customer experiences. |
Key Evidence from "Exhibits 1 to 34"
|
Exhibit # |
Details |
|
Exhibit 15 |
Text demonstrating inconsistencies
in baggage policy presentation, supporting the need for clearer guidelines
and better communication. |
|
Exhibit 19 |
Statements from passengers
reinforcing the need for improved transparency and communication in booking
and policy presentation processes. |
Key Recommendations for Improvement
This structured summary ties the “Recommendations
for Policy Improvement” claim to specific exhibits and document
sections, offering practical and actionable suggestions.